Photo
youarehereiamit:

veganbutt:

assbutt-in-the-garrison:

french-techno-robots:

beepish:

mr-cappadocia:

"Had sex with"
"She first slept with"
"would have regular intercourse"
"three counts of sexual intercourse"
A Nation run by Feminists… where a grown woman can fuck an eight year old boy repeatedly and the word “Rape” isn’t mentioned once.
Why? Because thanks to Feminists what she did isn’t considered rape.
And another Woman reaps the benefits of Feminist driven policy. Even if that means she can fuck/molest an eight year old boy repeatedly over the course of two years and get out a year after being sentenced.

this article was written by Kieran Corcoran, a quick google search revealing him to be a man. it was a man who believed that a boy couldn’t be raped by a woman, because a lot of men don’t believe that to be possible.
feminists are trying to work against that notion but it’s hard to do that when you keep blaming them for a thing that is a condition of a patriarchal society.

seriously, believing men can’t be raped is a result of misogynism, because women are “weak” and can’t hurt anyone, it stems from the same place that makes men think it’s cute when a girl’s angry, “Calm down sweetie.” Feminists care about all rape victims, don’t you dare pin this on us.

I am a feminist and I’m here to tell you that any real feminist would never condone this, and would certainly never just call it “sexual intercourse”. This is rape. And 8 year old child cannot consent. Period.

This is so fucked up we can’t ever mourn, discuss, or support the male victims of rape without some shithead misogynist making the entire issue about them and using this horrible abuse as a figurehead for their hateful agenda.You see a story of an abused kid and decide the FIRST THING to make this about is how much you hate women, instead of showing ANY regard (let alone solidarity or sympathy or support) to the actual victim.Fuck off

Also just a little bit of legal perspective: I realize this is a UK case but in most states in the US rape is actually statutorily defined as a man having forcible vaginal intercourse with a woman. It is a completely ass-backwards horrible statutory definition and everything else is labeled a “sexual offense.” It is literally the justice system that is enforcing the notion that only women can be victims of rape. It is a systematically enforced notion.  

youarehereiamit:

veganbutt:

assbutt-in-the-garrison:

french-techno-robots:

beepish:

mr-cappadocia:

"Had sex with"

"She first slept with"

"would have regular intercourse"

"three counts of sexual intercourse"

A Nation run by Feminists… where a grown woman can fuck an eight year old boy repeatedly and the word “Rape” isn’t mentioned once.

Why? Because thanks to Feminists what she did isn’t considered rape.

And another Woman reaps the benefits of Feminist driven policy. Even if that means she can fuck/molest an eight year old boy repeatedly over the course of two years and get out a year after being sentenced.

this article was written by Kieran Corcoran, a quick google search revealing him to be a man. it was a man who believed that a boy couldn’t be raped by a woman, because a lot of men don’t believe that to be possible.

feminists are trying to work against that notion but it’s hard to do that when you keep blaming them for a thing that is a condition of a patriarchal society.

seriously, believing men can’t be raped is a result of misogynism, because women are “weak” and can’t hurt anyone, it stems from the same place that makes men think it’s cute when a girl’s angry, “Calm down sweetie.” Feminists care about all rape victims, don’t you dare pin this on us.

I am a feminist and I’m here to tell you that any real feminist would never condone this, and would certainly never just call it “sexual intercourse”. This is rape. And 8 year old child cannot consent. Period.

This is so fucked up we can’t ever mourn, discuss, or support the male victims of rape without some shithead misogynist making the entire issue about them and using this horrible abuse as a figurehead for their hateful agenda.
You see a story of an abused kid and decide the FIRST THING to make this about is how much you hate women, instead of showing ANY regard (let alone solidarity or sympathy or support) to the actual victim.
Fuck off

Also just a little bit of legal perspective: I realize this is a UK case but in most states in the US rape is actually statutorily defined as a man having forcible vaginal intercourse with a woman. It is a completely ass-backwards horrible statutory definition and everything else is labeled a “sexual offense.” It is literally the justice system that is enforcing the notion that only women can be victims of rape. It is a systematically enforced notion.  

(via sorayachemaly)

Text

etspiritusvitae:

rosiesays:

Oppression is cooking being “women’s work,” while the overwhelming majority of top restaurant chefs are male.

Oppression is fashion being a “silly girl thing,” while the top earning designers and CEOs in fashion are male.

Oppression is reducing women to consumers profiting a male system, even in fields that we supposedly dominate.

this is so fucking important.

(Source: regular-snowflake, via sorayachemaly)

Tags: misogyny work
Text

marcovicci:

whats up w/ grown men who look at all the evils of the modern world and go “the real enemy is teenage girls, with their duckface and their smartphones and their selfies and their boy bands. they are destroying culture”

(via xmisterheatherx)

Text

yunglapras:

i hate that “LOL SO IF WOMEN ARE EQUAL CAN I PUNCH YOU” shit bc 1 in 3 women are abused

y’all are already punching us

the issue is that we’d like you to stop

(via brighteyedfemme)

Text

postdrunk:

a female lou reed would be considered a crazy junkie chick, a female morrissey would get laughed off every stage on this planet and a female iggy pop would be called the whore of the century you know its true

See: Every female musician ever.

(via lalalaetc)

Photo
yousoldtheworld:

lilamedusa:

basedmarina:

itstimeforfeminism:

calendar—girl:

girlsgetbusyzine:

writeswrongs:

cumaeansibyl:

coffeeandconlangs:

Unnecessary “fillers” in our speech. I’d rather have “like” than up-talking, though (if we had to choose one, that is). Ewwww, up-talking. Then again, a combination of the two would render me homicidal maniac.


Like, did you ever notice? That, like, the speech patterns people, like, think are stupid?  Are, like, commonly associated with, like, women?
And, like, there’s this thing? Where, like, women aren’t supposed to be, like, assertive? So they, like, qualify their speech? Because, like, we’re not supposed to, like, stand by our opinions?

1) humiliate women so they don’t feel qualified to speak authoritatively about anything
2) humiliate women for speaking in such a way that reflects how you treat her
3) laugh, you are superior because you don’t use words like “like.”  It isn’t as if being a huge stupid asshole has ever made you worse than a woman who speaks with verbal tics.  

The nail. It is hit on the head.


THEY DIDN’T EVEN FUCKING SPELL ACADEMY RIGHT

Also, fuck you, ALA. Linguistics aren’t meant to be prescriptive. 

"Awarness"

yousoldtheworld:

lilamedusa:

basedmarina:

itstimeforfeminism:

calendar—girl:

girlsgetbusyzine:

writeswrongs:

cumaeansibyl:

coffeeandconlangs:

Unnecessary “fillers” in our speech. I’d rather have “like” than up-talking, though (if we had to choose one, that is). Ewwww, up-talking. Then again, a combination of the two would render me homicidal maniac.

Like, did you ever notice? That, like, the speech patterns people, like, think are stupid?  Are, like, commonly associated with, like, women?

And, like, there’s this thing? Where, like, women aren’t supposed to be, like, assertive? So they, like, qualify their speech? Because, like, we’re not supposed to, like, stand by our opinions?

1) humiliate women so they don’t feel qualified to speak authoritatively about anything

2) humiliate women for speaking in such a way that reflects how you treat her

3) laugh, you are superior because you don’t use words like “like.”  It isn’t as if being a huge stupid asshole has ever made you worse than a woman who speaks with verbal tics.  

The nail. It is hit on the head.

THEY DIDN’T EVEN FUCKING SPELL ACADEMY RIGHT

Also, fuck you, ALA. Linguistics aren’t meant to be prescriptive. 

"Awarness"

(via agirlcalledchris)

Photoset
Tags: misogyny gif
Quote
"Labeling women as “crazy” is a way of controlling them. It may not be something planned or pre-meditated, but the ease with which men call women “crazy” says a lot about them. Calling a woman “crazy” is a quick and easy shut-down to any discussion. Once the “crazy” card has been pulled out, women are now put on the defensive: the onus is no longer on the man to address her concerns or her issue, it’s on her to justify her behavior, to prove that she is not, in fact, crazy or irrational. Men don’t even have to provide any sort of argument back – it’s a classic catch-22; “the fact that you don’t even see that you’re acting crazy is just proof that it’s crazy.”"

On Labeling Women “Crazy” (via sambwmn)

(via sambwmn)

Text

wretchedoftheearth:

I do find it funny that lesbians are perceived as man-hating but gay men are not perceived as woman-hating, and in fact are often illogically shielded from accusations of misogyny simply by being gay

(via agirlcalledchris)

Quote
"But confusingly, misogynists are sometimes men who speak softly and eat vegan and say “a woman’s sexual freedom is an essential component to her liberation. So come here.” It’s a tricky world out there. And while I’d prefer a critical approach to gender from men I elect, read and even bed, in my experience, the so-called feminist men I’ve met deep down have not been less antagonistic or bigoted toward women. What I see over and over again is misogyny in sheep’s clothing, and at this point, I would rather see wolves as wolves."

"Stop fawning over male feminists" (via hereticswords)

(Source: yoursocialconstructsareshowing, via agirlcalledchris)